As Home Office lawyers face two legal challenges from activists and charities on Monday, Home Office officials acknowledged that the plane may not take off due to challenges from lawyers working for refugees who have been told to flee their country. . The development comes after a coalition of two refugee charities, Detention Action and Care4Calais, and the PCS, which represents Border Forces personnel, were allowed to appeal against the rejection of their order on Friday morning. Monday. The charity Asylum Aid, with the support of Freedom from Torture, will make a new effort to stop the flight to the Supreme Court this afternoon. Although it was reported that 130 people who had come to the UK had received “removal instructions”, government sources said the number of those who could get on the plane to Rwanda was declining. “I think it could be canceled,” said a government source. “This is due to individual cases and not to a general challenge.” Lawyers acting on behalf of those dismissed are said to have either filed lawsuits over the weekend or warned they would do so on Monday or Tuesday. Many do so in accordance with the Human Rights Act or modern slavery legislation. An Iranian human rights informant – who was informed last week that he would be flown to the East African country despite fleeing to the UK after first-hand reporting possible violations by the Iranian government – is among those who received a letter this weekend. saying it will not be sent to Rwanda. The man, whose condition was first reported to the Guardian, received a letter from the Home Office, which was signed on Sunday, saying he would not leave on Tuesday, but said fears of another deportation attempt remained. “I’m still very worried about what happens next,” he said. A Spanish airline is believed to have agreed to take over the deportation flight on behalf of the Interior Ministry. According to Civil Aviation Authority records, Privilege Style was allowed to fly to Rwanda’s capital, Kigali, on Tuesday at 9.30pm from Stansted Airport in Essex. Care4Calais said on Monday that only 10 refugees who were to make their first flight outside the UK had been informed by the Home Office that it would remain in force. The appellate court will decide whether all flights should be canceled pending a review of Rwanda’s asylum policy next month. Home Secretary Priti Patel has argued that the offshore exploitation policy will help stem the growing number of people crossing the Channel in small boats to seek refuge in the UK. Questions remain about the status of those threatened with deportation. The Guardian understands that three age-disputed children, who the Interior Ministry said were adults and were being held in preparation for transfer to Rwanda, have now been released. Understandably, concerns have been raised about whether at least three other detainees threatened with deportation to the East African country are children and not adults. Subscribe to the First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every morning at 7 p.m. BST The Refugee Council said many of the people who were originally to be on Tuesday’s flight were children. The British Dental Association says it does not recognize the Home Office’s technique of using dental examinations to calculate a person’s age. Boris Johnson defended Rwanda’s plan despite criticism from the Prince of Wales, who reportedly described it as “disgusting” this weekend. The prime minister insisted that the plan was aimed at breaking the business model of human trafficking gangs. Asked if Charles was wrong, Johnson told LBC Radio: “What I do not think we should support is the continued activity of criminal gangs.” In an article for the Telegraph, the High Commissioner for Rwanda, John Bushingie, insisted that the country would be a “safe haven”. Busingye said he was disappointed that critics questioned Rwanda’s motives for agreeing to the plan and questioned its ability to provide safe haven for vulnerable asylum seekers.
